Article 17(Restrictions on employment of retired public officials) #
(1) None of the following institutions (hereinafter referred to as "institutions subject to employment screening") shall employ any public official specified in Article 3(1)1 through 12, along with public officials and employees of public-service-related organizations prescribed by the National Assembly Regulations, the Supreme Court Regulations, the Constitutional Court Regulations, the National Election Commission Regulations, or Presidential Decree, taking into account the possibility of unfair influence and impeding fair job performance (hereafter in this Chapter, referred to as "persons subject to employment screening"), for three years from his or her retirement; provided, when a person subject to employment screening receives verification that there is no close relevance between the affairs of the department or agency with which he or she was affiliated for five years before his or her retirement and the institution subject to employment screening or obtains approval for employment, from a public service ethics committee; such person may be employed: <Amended on Jun. 7, 2013; Dec. 30, 2014; Dec. 3, 2019; Aug. 14, 2025>
1. A for-profit private enterprise, the capital and annual apparent transactions of which exceed a specified scale (referring to the supply value prescribed in Article 29 of the Value-Added Tax Act; hereinafter the same shall apply);
2. A corporation or organization established for the sake of the common interests, mutual cooperation, etc. of a private enterprise referred to in subparagraph 1;
3. A law firm established under Article 40 of the Attorney-at-Law Act, the annual apparent transactions of which exceed a specified scale, a (limited) liability law firm established under Article 58-2 of the said Act, a law firm partnership established under Article 58-18 of the said Act, or a law office established under Article 89-6(3) of the said Act (hereinafter referred to as "law firm, etc.");
4. An accounting firm established under Article 23(1) of the Certified Public Accountant Act, the annual apparent transactions of which exceed a specified scale;
5. A tax accounting firm established under Article 16-3(1) of the Certified Tax Accountant Act, the annual apparent transactions of which exceed a specified scale;
6. A foreign legal consultant office defined in subparagraph 4 of Article 2 of the Foreign Legal Consultant Act or a joint venture law firm defined in subparagraph 9 of the same Article, the annual apparent transactions of which exceed a specified scale;
7. A market-based public corporation referred to in Article 5(3)1a of the Act on the Management of Public Institutions;
8. A public-service-related organization performing duties prescribed by Presidential Decree, such as supervision of safety, regulation on authorization and permission, and procurement duties;
9. An educational foundation that has established and runs any of the schools defined in the subparagraphs of Article 2 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act or defined in the subparagraphs of Article 2 of the Higher Education Act, and a private school established and run by an educational foundation; provided, where a person subject to employment screening is employed as a teacher prescribed by Presidential Decree, the relevant educational foundation or school shall be excluded;
10. A general hospital referred to in Article 3-3 of the Medical Service Act and any of following corporations that have established a general hospital:
a. A medical corporation referred to in Article 33(2)3 of the Medical Service Act;
b. A nonprofit corporation referred to in Article 33(2)4 of the Medical Service Act;
11. Any of following, the endowment of which exceeds a specified scale:
a. A social welfare foundation defined in subparagraph 3 of Article 2 of the Social Welfare Services Act;
b. A nonprofit corporation, other than social welfare foundations referred to in item a, which operates a social welfare facility defined in subparagraph 4 of Article 2 of the Social Welfare Services Act;
12. Any of the following private enterprises, corporations, or organizations which meet the standards prescribed by Presidential Decree:
a. A private enterprise, corporation, or organization in the field of the defense industry;
b. A private enterprise, corporation, or organization that conducts certification, inspection, etc. related to public safety concerning food, etc.
b. A private enterprise, corporation, or organization whose annual gross sales exceed a certain level and that performs design or supervision services in the architectural or construction field.
(2) The scope of close relevance prescribed in the proviso of paragraph (1) means that the duties of the department with which a person subject to employment screening has been affiliated for five years before his or her retirement fall under any of the following: <Amended on Dec. 30, 2014; Dec. 3, 2019>
1. Duties of providing financial assistance, including allocating or paying grants, incentives, subsidies, etc. directly or indirectly;
2. Duties directly related to authorization, permission, licenses, patents, approval, etc.;
3. Duties directly related to inspections and audits of methods of production, specifications, accounting, etc.;
4. Duties directly related to assessment, imposition, and collection of taxes;
5. Duties directly related to contracts for, and inspections and acceptance of construction works, services, or purchase of goods;
6. Duties of direct supervision under statutes or regulations;
7. Duties related to investigations, examinations of, and ruling on, a case to which an institution subject to employment screening is a party or in which it has direct interests;
8. Other Duties prescribed by the National Assembly Regulations, Supreme Court Regulations, Constitutional Court Regulations, National Election Commission Regulations, or Presidential Decree.
(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (2), where the duties of an agency with which any of the following persons subject to employment screening (hereinafter referred to as "person subject to employment screening based on the duties of an agency") has been affiliated for five years before his or her retirement constitute any of duties prescribed in the subparagraphs of paragraph (2), such duties shall be deemed to have close relevance: <Added on Dec. 30, 2014>
1. A person subject to disclosure of property referred to in the subparagraphs of Article 10(1);
2. A public official, other than public officials subject to disclosure of property referred to in subparagraph 1, among public officials who belong to the Senior Executive Service;
3. A public official of at least Grade II;
4. An executive officer of a public-service-related organization;
5. A public official or an employee of a public-service-related organization in a specific field prescribed by the National Assembly Regulations, the Supreme Court Regulations, the Constitutional Court Regulations, the National Election Commission Regulations, or Presidential Decree.
(4) In determining where a person is employed under paragraph (1), if the person engages in the business of an institution subject to employment screening or provides assistance, such as advice and counsel, thereto and receives a wage, salary, etc. in return for such service on a regular basis or during a specified period, such person shall be deemed employed, regardless of his or her position or duties, such as an outside director, consultant, or advisor prescribed in the Commercial Act, or the type of contract. <Amended on Dec. 30, 2014; Dec. 3, 2019>
(5) Where a person subject to employment screening falls under any of the following in relation to the duties specified in the subparagraphs of paragraph (2), which such person processed or the decision-making process of which such person participated in for five years before his or her retirement, the duties of the department with which the person subject to employment screening was affiliated shall be deemed to have close relevance prescribed in the proviso of paragraph (1), to the duties of a relevant law firm, etc., accounting corporation, tax accounting corporation, foreign legal consultant office, or joint venture law firm: <Amended on Dec. 3, 2019>
1. Where a law firm, etc. accepts a case (including acceptance specified in the subparagraphs of Article 31(4) of the Attorney-at-Law Act);
2. Where an accounting corporation performs duties under the subparagraphs of Article 2 of the Certified Public Accountant Act;
3. Where a tax accounting corporation performs duties under the subparagraphs of Article 2 of the Certified Tax Accountant Act;
4. Where a foreign legal consultant office performs duties under the subparagraphs of Article 24 of the Foreign Legal Consultant Act;
5. Where a joint venture law firm performs duties under Article 35-19 of the Foreign Legal Consultant Act.
(6) In determining close relevance under paragraphs (2) and (3), a public service ethics committee shall keep a balance between a retired public official's private interests, such as his or her freedom and rights, and public interests through prevention of unfair influence by the retired public official, and where it examines or determines whether or not to approve the employment of a retired public official deemed to have close relevance pursuant to paragraphs (3) and (5) pursuant to the proviso of paragraph (1), it shall endeavor to prevent any unreasonable limit on the rights of the relevant person subject to employment screening, in consideration of the number of relevant cases handled, and the frequency and importance of relevant duties, etc. <Amended on Dec. 30, 2014>
(7) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) through (3), an attorney-at-law referred to in Article 4 of the Attorney-at-Law Act, a certified public accountant referred to in Article 3 of the Certified Public Accountant Act, and a tax accountant referred to in Article 3 of the Certified Tax Accountant Act, among persons subject to employment screening, other than those subject to disclosure of property referred to in the subparagraphs of Article 10(1), may be employed by a law firm, etc. or a joint venture law firm, an accounting firm, and a tax accounting firm, respectively. <Amended on Dec. 30, 2014; Dec. 3, 2019>
(8) For the purposes of paragraph (1), the scale and scope of a department or an agency, the scale and scope of an institution subject to employment screening, and other matters, shall be determined by the National Assembly Regulations, the Supreme Court Regulations, the Constitutional Court Regulations, the National Election Commission Regulations, or Presidential Decree. <Amended on Dec. 30, 2014; Dec. 3, 2019>
(9) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) through (3), where a person subject to employment screening is employed to perform the following duties, it shall be deemed that there is no close relevance as specified in the proviso of paragraph (1): <Added on Dec. 3, 2019; Jan. 4, 2022>
1. Emergency preparedness duties under the Act on Emergency Preparedness;
2. Duties of commanders of reserve forces under the Reserve Forces Act;
3. Other simple affairs concerning implementation that are publicly notified by the competent public service ethics committee as having no relevance to business affairs.
[This Article Wholly Amended on Sep. 29, 2011]
[Title Amended on Dec. 30, 2014]