Article 39-17(Restrictions on employment at senior citizen-related institutions) #
(1) Where a court sentences a person to a penalty or medical treatment and custody for committing a crime related to elder abuse, it shall issue an order (referring to notice in cases of a summary order) to prohibit such person from operating any of the following facilities or institutions (hereinafter referred to as "senior citizen-related institutions") or from finding a job at or providing actual labor to senior citizen-related institutions (hereinafter referred to as "order of employment restriction") for a specified period (hereinafter referred to as "period of restricted employment") from the date the execution of such penalty or medical treatment and custody is wholly or partially terminated, suspended, or exempted (where a person is sentenced to punishment of a fine, referring to the date such sentence is made final and conclusive) by ruling (including a summary order; hereinafter the same shall apply), concurrently as it renders a judgment on the relevant crime; provided, the foregoing shall not apply where the person is highly unlikely to recommit a crime, or where it is deemed there are extenuating circumstances to lift the restriction of employment: <Amended on May 29, 2016; Dec. 11, 2018; Jun. 13, 2023>
1. A welfare facility for senior citizens referred to in Article 31;
2. A long-term care institution referred to in Article 31 of the Long-Term Care Insurance Act;
3. The emergency call centers provided for by Article 4-6 of the Act on the Prevention of Domestic Violence and Protection of Victims, counseling centers related to domestic violence provided for by Article 5 of that Act, and protection facilities for victims of domestic violence provided for by Article 7-2 of that Act;
4. The healthy home support centers provided for by Article 35 of the Framework Act on Healthy Families;
5. The support centers for multicultural families provided for by Article 12 of the Multicultural Families Support Act;
6. The counseling centers for victims of sexual assault provided for by Article 10 of the Sexual Violence Prevention and Victims Protection Act, protective facilities for victims of sexual assault provided for by Article 12 of that Act, and integrated support centers for victims of sexual assault provided for by Article 18 of that Act;
7. A medical institution referred to in Article 3 of the Medical Service Act;
8. The welfare facilities for persons with disabilities provided for by Article 58 of the Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities;
9. A mental health welfare center or mental health improvement facility referred to in Article 3 of the Act on the Improvement of Mental Health and the Support for Welfare Services for Mental Patients;
10. An institution or organization that provides service for senior citizens living alone under Article 27-2;
11. A Support Center for Senior Citizens Living Alone under Article 27-3;
12. An institution providing activity assistant services under subparagraph 6 of Article 2 of the Act on Support for Activities of Persons with Disabilities;
13. A dementia care center under Article 17 of the Dementia Management Act.
(2) The period of restricted employment referred to in paragraph (1) shall not exceed 10 years. <Added on Dec. 11, 2018>
(3) Where the court intends to issue an order of employment restriction under paragraph (1), it may seek opinions on the recidivism risk, etc. of the person subject to the order of employment restriction from neuropsychiatrists, psychologists, scholars of social welfare science, experts related to elder abuse, and other relevant experts. <Added on Dec. 11, 2018>
(4) The head of an administrative agency having jurisdiction over the report on, authorization, permission, etc. for establishment of any senior citizen-related institution specified in any subparagraph of paragraph (1) (hereafter referred to as "head of the competent administrative agency" in this Article) shall request the heads of the relevant agencies to inquire into the elder abuse-related criminal history of a person who intends to operate any senior citizen-related institution, after obtaining consent from the relevant person; provided, where a person who intends to operate a senior citizen-related institution directly submits a written reply to a request for inquiry of elder abuse-related criminal history to the head of the competent administrative agency, it shall be deemed that the inquiry of elder abuse-related criminal history has been conducted. <Amended on Dec. 11, 2018>
(5) The head of a senior citizen-related institution shall verify whether a person currently working for, or providing actual labor to, the institution or a person intending to be employed by, or to provide actual labor to, the institution (hereinafter referred to as "employee, etc.") has any criminal history related to elder abuse; in such cases, he or she shall request that the heads of the relevant agencies inquire into such criminal history, after obtaining consent from the relevant person; provided, where employees, etc. directly submit a written reply to a request for inquiry of elder abuse-related criminal history to the heads of senior citizen-related institutions, it shall be deemed that the inquiry of elder abuse-related criminal history has been conducted. <Amended on Dec. 11, 2018>
(6) The head of the competent administrative agency shall inspect and verify, directly or by inquiries from the relevant agencies, etc., whether any person subject to an order of employment restriction operates any senior citizen-related institution or works for or provides actual labor to such institution at least once per year, and submit the outcomes thereof to the head of the competent administrative agency. In such cases, the head of the relevant central administrative agency shall disclose the results of the inspection and verification using the website, etc. as prescribed by Presidential Decree. <Amended on Dec. 11, 2018; Jun. 13, 2023>
(7) Where it is necessary for the check and verification prescribed in paragraph (6), the head of the competent administrative agency may request submission of related data from the head of the relevant senior citizen-related institution. <Added on Dec. 11, 2018>
(8) Where the head of a senior citizen-related institution finds out that any person subject to an order of employment restriction is working for or providing actual labor to the senior citizen-related institution, he or she shall dismiss such person immediately. <Added on Dec. 11, 2018>
(9) Where any person is operating a senior citizen-related institution in violation of an order of employment restriction, the head of the competent administrative agency shall require such head of the senior citizen-related institution to close the institution; and where any person is working for or providing actual labor to a senior citizen-related institution in violation of an order of employment restriction, the head of the competent administrative agency shall require the head of the senior citizen-related institution to dismiss such person. <Amended on Dec. 11, 2018>
(10) Where the head of a senior citizen-related institution refuses to comply with a request for closure referred to in paragraph (9) without good cause or fails to do as requested within three months, the head of the competent administrative agency may close the senior citizen-related institution, revoke the permission, authorization, etc. for the institution, or require the head of the relevant administrative agency to do so, as prescribed by Presidential Decree. <Amended on Dec. 11, 2018>
(11) Upon receipt of a request for inquiries into elder abuse-related criminal history under paragraphs (4) through (6), the heads of the relevant agencies shall issue a written reply to a request for inquiry of elder abuse-related criminal history. <Amended on Dec. 11, 2018>
(12) Matters necessary for the procedures for and scope of a request for inquiry of elder abuse-related criminal history, the methods for submitting the outcomes of check and verification, etc. prescribed in paragraphs (4) through (6) shall be prescribed by Presidential Decree. <Amended on Dec. 11, 2018>
[This Article Added on Dec. 29, 2015]